Skip to main content

HBase Utility - Merging Regions in HBase

 

Growing HBase Cluster, and difficulty to get physical hardware is something that every enterprise deals with...

And sometimes, the amount of ingest starts putting pressure on components before new hosts can be added. As, I write this post our cluster was running with 46 nodes and each node having 600 regions per server. This is bad for performance.

You can use the following formula to estimate the number of regions for a RegionServer:

(regionserver_memory_size) * (memstore_fraction) / ((memstore_size) * (num_column_families))

Reference https://docs.cloudera.com/HDPDocuments/HDP3/HDP-3.0.0/hbase-data-access/content/memstore-size-regionservers.html


We noticed that HBase doesn't have automatic process to reduce and merge regions. As over the time, many small size or empty regions are formed on cluster which degrades the performance. 

While researching to cope up with this problem: we came across following scripts - 

  • https://appsintheopen.com/posts/51-merge-empty-hbase-regions
  • https://blg.robot-house.us/posts/merging-regions-in-hbase/
We analyzed that - 
  • It is merging empty regions only.
  • Later ruby script creates occasional overlaps. 
  • It doesn't have check for Degenerated, Splitting, Meta Region.
  • It doesn't have size based check, such that merge should not lead to HStore size greater then hregion.max.filesize.

  • It is using deprecated Java functions.
  • It is merging same region again which many a times lead to error where region is not found.

So, we came up with enhanced Java Utility, with all the checks in place. Such that it helps merging adjacent regions - 

Note - HBase region adjacent means lexicographically adjacent. That is end key of one region is start key of another, which can be hosted on different region servers.


Command to run Merge Script - 
 

sh merge_hbase_table.sh "<HBase Table Name>" true

Java Source code location - 

https://github.com/dinesh028/engineering/blob/master/HBaseUtility/src/main/java/com/aquaifer/HBaseMergePartitions.java 


This Utility is utilizes Online Merge https://docs.cloudera.com/runtime/7.2.10/managing-hbase/topics/hbase-online-merge.html , which issues Asynchronous command to Merge Adjacent Regions.


This Utility helped us bring down 18652 regions to 14500 in a few minutes. But, use this utility in off-hours as Merge Regions may invoke minor and major compactions, which in-turn can lead to performance degradation.


Another way is to set appropriate SPLIT_PLOICY on HBaseTable - 

alter '<TABLE_NAME>', {'SPLIT_POLICY' => '<SPLIT_POLICY>'}


<SPLIT_POLICY> can be replaced with one of below - 

  • org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.ConstantSizeRegionSplitPolicy

A RegionSplitPolicy implementation which splits a region as soon as any of its store files exceeds a maximum configurable size.

  • org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy

Split size is the number of regions that are on this server that all are of the same table, cubed, times 2x the region flush size OR the maximum region split size, whichever is smaller.

For example, if the flush size is 128MB, then after two flushes (256MB) we will split which will make two regions that will split when their size is 2^3 * 128MB*2 = 2048MB.

If one of these regions splits, then there are three regions and now the split size is 3^3 * 128MB*2 = 6912MB, and so on until we reach the configured maximum file size and then from there on out, we'll use that.

  • org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.BusyRegionSplitPolicy

This class represents a split policy which makes the split decision based on how busy a region is. The metric that is used here is the fraction of total write requests that are blocked due to high memstore utilization. This fractional rate is calculated over a running window of "hbase.busy.policy.aggWindow" milliseconds. The rate is a time-weighted aggregated average of the rate in the current window and the true average rate in the previous window.

  • org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.DelimitedKeyPrefixRegionSplitPolicy
  • org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.KeyPrefixRegionSplitPolicy
  • org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.SteppingSplitPolicy


Comments

Popular posts

Spark MongoDB Connector Not leading to correct count or data while reading

  We are using Scala 2.11 , Spark 2.4 and Spark MongoDB Connector 2.4.4 Use Case 1 - We wanted to read a Shareded Mongo Collection and copy its data to another Mongo Collection. We noticed that after Spark Job successful completion. Output MongoDB did not had many records. Use Case 2 -  We read a MongoDB collection and doing count on dataframe lead to different count on each execution. Analysis,  We realized that MongoDB Spark Connector is missing data on bulk read as a dataframe. We tried various partitioner, listed on page -  https://www.mongodb.com/docs/spark-connector/v2.4/configuration/  But, none of them worked for us. Finally, we tried  MongoShardedPartitioner  this lead to constant count on each execution. But, it was greater than the actual count of records on the collection. This seems to be limitation with MongoDB Spark Connector. But,  MongoShardedPartitioner  seemed closest possible solution to this kind of situation. But, it per...




Scala Spark building Jar leads java.lang.StackOverflowError

  Exception -  [Thread-3] ERROR scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - error: java.lang.StackOverflowError [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.generic.TraversableForwarder$class.isEmpty(TraversableForwarder.scala:36) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.isEmpty(ListBuffer.scala:45) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.toList(ListBuffer.scala:306) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.result(ListBuffer.scala:300) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.Stack$StackBuilder.result(Stack.scala:31) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.Stack$StackBuilder.result(Stack.scala:27) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.generic.GenericCompanion.apply(GenericCompanion.scala:50) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompile...




MongoDB Chunk size many times bigger than configure chunksize (128 MB)

  Shard Shard_0 at Shard_0/xyz.com:27018 { data: '202.04GiB', docs: 117037098, chunks: 5, 'estimated data per chunk': '40.4GiB', 'estimated docs per chunk': 23407419 } --- Shard Shard_1 at Shard_1/abc.com:27018 { data: '201.86GiB', docs: 116913342, chunks: 4, 'estimated data per chunk': '50.46GiB', 'estimated docs per chunk': 29228335 } Per MongoDB-  Starting in 6.0.3, we balance by data size instead of the number of chunks. So the 128MB is now only the size of data we migrate at-a-time. So large data size per chunk is good now, as long as the data size per shard is even for the collection. refer -  https://www.mongodb.com/community/forums/t/chunk-size-many-times-bigger-than-configure-chunksize-128-mb/212616 https://www.mongodb.com/docs/v6.0/release-notes/6.0/#std-label-release-notes-6.0-balancing-policy-changes




AWS EMR Spark – Much Larger Executors are Created than Requested

  Starting EMR 5.32 and EMR 6.2 you can notice that Spark can launch much larger executors that you request in your job settings. For example - We started a Spark Job with  spark.executor.cores  =   4 But, one can see that the executors with 20 cores (instead of 4 as defined by spark.executor.cores) were launched. The reason for allocating larger executors is that there is a AWS specific Spark option spark.yarn.heterogeneousExecutors.enabled (exists in EMR only, does not exist in Open Source Spark) that is set to true by default that combines multiple executor creation requests on the same node into a larger executor container. So as the result you have fewer executor containers than you expected, each of them has more memory and cores that you specified. If you disable this option (--conf "spark.yarn.heterogeneousExecutors.enabled=false"), EMR will create containers with the specified spark.executor.memory and spark.executor.cores settings and will not co...




Hive Count Query not working

Hive with Tez execution engine -  count(*) not working , returning 0 results.  Solution -  set hive.compute.query.using.stats=false Refer -  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Configuration+Properties hive.compute.query.using.stats Default Value:  false Added In: Hive 0.13.0 with  HIVE-5483 When set to true Hive will answer a few queries like min, max, and count(1) purely using statistics stored in the metastore. For basic statistics collection, set the configuration property  hive.stats.autogather   to true. For more advanced statistics collection, run ANALYZE TABLE queries.