Skip to main content

Log4J JNDI Vulnerability

 

This post is an extension of https://querydb.blogspot.com/2021/09/solving-jenkins-maven-build-xray-log4j.html
Apart from fix that was discussed in https://querydb.blogspot.com/2021/09/solving-jenkins-maven-build-xray-log4j.html. It is required to upgrade Log4J to 2.15.0 or above due to JNDI attack. 

Refer below figure to understand the deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code.




There are certain posts which suggest to set below property 
  • log4j2.formatMsgNoLookups
But, that's serious vulnerability, you shouldn't contemplate these workarounds and upgrade Log4j jars. Refer https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html

"A new CVE (CVE-2021-45046, see above) was raised for this.

Other insufficient mitigation measures are: setting system property log4j2.formatMsgNoLookups or environment variable LOG4J_FORMAT_MSG_NO_LOOKUPS to true for releases >= 2.10, or modifying the logging configuration to disable message lookups with %m{nolookups}, %msg{nolookups} or %message{nolookups} for releases >= 2.7 and <= 2.14.1.

The reason these measures are insufficient is that, in addition to the Thread Context attack vector mentioned above, there are still code paths in Log4j where message lookups could occur: known examples are applications that use Logger.printf("%s", userInput), or applications that use a custom message factory, where the resulting messages do not implement StringBuilderFormattable. There may be other attack vectors.

The safest thing to do is to upgrade Log4j to a safe version, or remove the JndiLookup class from the log4j-core jar."

Comments

Popular posts

Read from a hive table and write back to it using spark sql

In context to Spark 2.2 - if we read from an hive table and write to same, we get following exception- scala > dy . write . mode ( "overwrite" ). insertInto ( "incremental.test2" ) org . apache . spark . sql . AnalysisException : Cannot insert overwrite into table that is also being read from .; org . apache . spark . sql . AnalysisException : Cannot insert overwrite into table that is also being read from .; 1. This error means that our process is reading from same table and writing to same table. 2. Normally, this should work as process writes to directory .hiveStaging... 3. This error occurs in case of saveAsTable method, as it overwrites entire table instead of individual partitions. 4. This error should not occur with insertInto method, as it overwrites partitions not the table. 5. A reason why this happening is because Hive table has following Spark TBLProperties in its definition. This problem will solve for insertInto met




Hive Parse JSON with Array Columns and Explode it in to Multiple rows.

 Say we have a JSON String like below -  { "billingCountry":"US" "orderItems":[       {          "itemId":1,          "product":"D1"       },   {          "itemId":2,          "product":"D2"       }    ] } And, our aim is to get output parsed like below -  itemId product 1 D1 2 D2   First, We can parse JSON as follows to get JSON String get_json_object(value, '$.orderItems.itemId') as itemId get_json_object(value, '$.orderItems.product') as product Second, Above will result String value like "[1,2]". We want to convert it to Array as follows - split(regexp_extract(get_json_object(value, '$.orderItems.itemId'),'^\\["(.*)\\"]$',1),'","') as itemId split(regexp_extract(get_json_object(value, '$.orderItems.product'),'^\\["(.*)\\"]$',1),&




Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: org.apache.parquet.column.values.dictionary.PlainValuesDictionary$PlainIntegerDictionary

Exception -  Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: org.apache.parquet.column.values.dictionary.PlainValuesDictionary$PlainIntegerDictionary at org.apache.parquet.column.Dictionary.decodeToBinary(Dictionary.java:44) at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.vectorized.ColumnVector.getUTF8String(ColumnVector.java:645) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown Source) Analysis - This might occur because of data type mismatch between Hive Table & written Parquet file. Solution - Correct the data type to match between Hive Table & Parquet




org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Cannot overwrite a path that is also being read from.;

  Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Cannot overwrite a path that is also being read from.; at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.DDLUtils$.verifyNotReadPath(ddl.scala:906) at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSourceAnalysis$$anonfun$apply$1.applyOrElse(DataSourceStrategy.scala:192) at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSourceAnalysis$$anonfun$apply$1.applyOrElse(DataSourceStrategy.scala:134) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$2.apply(TreeNode.scala:267) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$2.apply(TreeNode.scala:267) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:70) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:266) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transform(TreeNode.scala:256) at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSourceAnalysis.apply(DataSourceStrategy.scala:134) at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasource




Hadoop Distcp Error Duplicate files in input path

  One may face following error while copying data from one cluster to other, using Distcp  Command: hadoop distcp -i {src} {tgt} Error: org.apache.hadoop.toolsCopyListing$DulicateFileException: File would cause duplicates. Ideally there can't be same file names. So, what might be happening in your case is you trying to copy partitioned table from one cluster to other. And, 2 different named partitions have same file name. Your solution is to correct Source path  {src}  in your command, such that you provide path uptil partitioned sub directory, not the file. For ex - Refer below : /a/partcol=1/file1.txt /a/partcol=2/file1.txt If you use  {src}  as  "/a/*/*"  then you will get the error  "File would cause duplicates." But, if you use  {src}  as  "/a"  then you will not get error in copying.