Skip to main content

Spark Disable BroadCast Join not working in case of BroadcastNestedLoopJoin


We were running an application which was leading to below error - 

Caused by: org.apache.spark.SparkException: Could not execute broadcast in 300 secs. You can increase the timeout for broadcasts via spark.sql.broadcastTimeout or disable broadcast join by setting spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold to -1
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.BroadcastExchangeExec.doExecuteBroadcast(BroadcastExchangeExec.scala:150)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$executeBroadcast$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:154)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$executeBroadcast$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:150)

Even after setting the below property, which is to disable BroadCast Join. We kept getting above error again.

Set spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold=-1


On further analysis, we found that it is not a Bug in Spark. You expect the broadcast to stop after you disable the broadcast threshold, by setting spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold to -1, but Apache Spark tries to broadcast the bigger table and fails with a broadcast error.

Note that you can see "BroadcastNestedLoopJoin" in Spark WebUI or invoking ".explain(true)" on dataframe to visualize physical plan.


Solution -

To fix above problem, we replaced "not in" clause in our SQL with "not exists" clause. For example - 

select * from Table1 where id not in ( select if from table2)

rewritten as - 

select * from Table 1 where not exists ( select 1 from Table2 where table1.id=table2.id)


Explanation - 

In SQL, not in means that if there is any null value in the not in values, the result is empty. This is why it can only be executed with BroadcastNestedLoopJoin. All not in values must be known in order to ensure there is no null value in the set.


Similarly, 

Below example will result in to BroadcastNestedLoopJoin -

df1.join(df2, $"id1" === $"id2" || $"id2" === $"id3", "left")

rewritten as - 

df1.join(df2, $"id1" === $"id2", "left").join(df2, $"id2" === $"id3", "left")


Reference -

You can read details about same here - https://kb.databricks.com/sql/disable-broadcast-when-broadcastnestedloopjoin.html


Comments

Popular posts

Spark MongoDB Connector Not leading to correct count or data while reading

  We are using Scala 2.11 , Spark 2.4 and Spark MongoDB Connector 2.4.4 Use Case 1 - We wanted to read a Shareded Mongo Collection and copy its data to another Mongo Collection. We noticed that after Spark Job successful completion. Output MongoDB did not had many records. Use Case 2 -  We read a MongoDB collection and doing count on dataframe lead to different count on each execution. Analysis,  We realized that MongoDB Spark Connector is missing data on bulk read as a dataframe. We tried various partitioner, listed on page -  https://www.mongodb.com/docs/spark-connector/v2.4/configuration/  But, none of them worked for us. Finally, we tried  MongoShardedPartitioner  this lead to constant count on each execution. But, it was greater than the actual count of records on the collection. This seems to be limitation with MongoDB Spark Connector. But,  MongoShardedPartitioner  seemed closest possible solution to this kind of situation. But, it per...




Scala Spark building Jar leads java.lang.StackOverflowError

  Exception -  [Thread-3] ERROR scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - error: java.lang.StackOverflowError [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.generic.TraversableForwarder$class.isEmpty(TraversableForwarder.scala:36) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.isEmpty(ListBuffer.scala:45) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.toList(ListBuffer.scala:306) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.result(ListBuffer.scala:300) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.Stack$StackBuilder.result(Stack.scala:31) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.Stack$StackBuilder.result(Stack.scala:27) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.generic.GenericCompanion.apply(GenericCompanion.scala:50) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompile...




MongoDB Chunk size many times bigger than configure chunksize (128 MB)

  Shard Shard_0 at Shard_0/xyz.com:27018 { data: '202.04GiB', docs: 117037098, chunks: 5, 'estimated data per chunk': '40.4GiB', 'estimated docs per chunk': 23407419 } --- Shard Shard_1 at Shard_1/abc.com:27018 { data: '201.86GiB', docs: 116913342, chunks: 4, 'estimated data per chunk': '50.46GiB', 'estimated docs per chunk': 29228335 } Per MongoDB-  Starting in 6.0.3, we balance by data size instead of the number of chunks. So the 128MB is now only the size of data we migrate at-a-time. So large data size per chunk is good now, as long as the data size per shard is even for the collection. refer -  https://www.mongodb.com/community/forums/t/chunk-size-many-times-bigger-than-configure-chunksize-128-mb/212616 https://www.mongodb.com/docs/v6.0/release-notes/6.0/#std-label-release-notes-6.0-balancing-policy-changes




AWS EMR Spark – Much Larger Executors are Created than Requested

  Starting EMR 5.32 and EMR 6.2 you can notice that Spark can launch much larger executors that you request in your job settings. For example - We started a Spark Job with  spark.executor.cores  =   4 But, one can see that the executors with 20 cores (instead of 4 as defined by spark.executor.cores) were launched. The reason for allocating larger executors is that there is a AWS specific Spark option spark.yarn.heterogeneousExecutors.enabled (exists in EMR only, does not exist in Open Source Spark) that is set to true by default that combines multiple executor creation requests on the same node into a larger executor container. So as the result you have fewer executor containers than you expected, each of them has more memory and cores that you specified. If you disable this option (--conf "spark.yarn.heterogeneousExecutors.enabled=false"), EMR will create containers with the specified spark.executor.memory and spark.executor.cores settings and will not co...




Hive Count Query not working

Hive with Tez execution engine -  count(*) not working , returning 0 results.  Solution -  set hive.compute.query.using.stats=false Refer -  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Configuration+Properties hive.compute.query.using.stats Default Value:  false Added In: Hive 0.13.0 with  HIVE-5483 When set to true Hive will answer a few queries like min, max, and count(1) purely using statistics stored in the metastore. For basic statistics collection, set the configuration property  hive.stats.autogather   to true. For more advanced statistics collection, run ANALYZE TABLE queries.