Skip to main content

3 tier architecture application or MVC application are different or same

Answer :-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multitier_architecture#Comparison_with_the_MVC_architecture
Comparison with the MVC architecture

At first glance, the three tiers may seem similar to the model-view-controller (MVC) concept; however, topologically they are different. A fundamental rule in a three tier architecture is the client tier never communicates directly with the data tier; in a three-tier model all communication must pass through the middle tier. Conceptually the three-tier architecture is linear. However, the MVC architecture is triangular: the view sends updates to the controller, the controller updates the model, and the view gets updated directly from the model.

From a historical perspective the three-tier architecture concept emerged in the 1990s from observations of distributed systems (e.g., web applications) where the client, middle ware and data tiers ran on physically separate platforms. Whereas MVC comes from the previous decade (by work at Xerox PARC in the late 1970s and early 1980s) and is based on observations of applications that ran on a single graphical workstation; MVC was applied to distributed applications later in its history (see Model 2).

Today, MVC and similar MVP are Separation of Concerns design patterns that apply exclusively to the presentation layer of a larger system. In simple scenarios MVC may represent the primary design of a system, reaching directly into the database; however, in most scenarios the C (Controller) and M (Model) in MVC have a loose dependency on either a Service or Data layer/tier.

Question:-
Whats difference?

Answer:-
3 teir is a form of theoritical side .
while MVC is implemented practically. just like a layered architure and its implementation can be OSI & TCP-IP model.

They both are divided into 3 parts but difference comes in communication between 3 layers . If communication is of the linear form
or trinagular form that is diffrent. In a MVC model ther can be 2 commuincations,

1) View calling controller ; controller calling model & vice versa
2) View calling controller; controller calling model & model in turn updating view.

So,important difference would be 3 tier is theoretical, while MVC is practical.

Comments

Popular posts

Hive Parse JSON with Array Columns and Explode it in to Multiple rows.

 Say we have a JSON String like below -  { "billingCountry":"US" "orderItems":[       {          "itemId":1,          "product":"D1"       },   {          "itemId":2,          "product":"D2"       }    ] } And, our aim is to get output parsed like below -  itemId product 1 D1 2 D2   First, We can parse JSON as follows to get JSON String get_json_object(value, '$.orderItems.itemId') as itemId get_json_object(value, '$.orderItems.product') as product Second, Above will result String value like "[1,2]". We want to convert it to Array as follows - split(regexp_extract(get_json_object(value, '$.orderItems.itemId'),'^\\["(.*)\\"]$',1),'","') as itemId split(regexp_extract(get_json_object(value, '$.orderItems.product'),'^\\["(.*)\\"]$',1),...




Scala Spark building Jar leads java.lang.StackOverflowError

  Exception -  [Thread-3] ERROR scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - error: java.lang.StackOverflowError [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.generic.TraversableForwarder$class.isEmpty(TraversableForwarder.scala:36) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.isEmpty(ListBuffer.scala:45) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.toList(ListBuffer.scala:306) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.result(ListBuffer.scala:300) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.Stack$StackBuilder.result(Stack.scala:31) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.mutable.Stack$StackBuilder.result(Stack.scala:27) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompileMojo - at scala.collection.generic.GenericCompanion.apply(GenericCompanion.scala:50) [Thread-3] INFO scala_maven.ScalaCompile...




org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Cannot overwrite a path that is also being read from.;

  Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Cannot overwrite a path that is also being read from.; at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.DDLUtils$.verifyNotReadPath(ddl.scala:906) at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSourceAnalysis$$anonfun$apply$1.applyOrElse(DataSourceStrategy.scala:192) at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSourceAnalysis$$anonfun$apply$1.applyOrElse(DataSourceStrategy.scala:134) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$2.apply(TreeNode.scala:267) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$2.apply(TreeNode.scala:267) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:70) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:266) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transform(TreeNode.scala:256) at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSourceAnalysis.apply(DataSourceStrategy.scala:134) at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.dataso...




MongoDB Chunk size many times bigger than configure chunksize (128 MB)

  Shard Shard_0 at Shard_0/xyz.com:27018 { data: '202.04GiB', docs: 117037098, chunks: 5, 'estimated data per chunk': '40.4GiB', 'estimated docs per chunk': 23407419 } --- Shard Shard_1 at Shard_1/abc.com:27018 { data: '201.86GiB', docs: 116913342, chunks: 4, 'estimated data per chunk': '50.46GiB', 'estimated docs per chunk': 29228335 } Per MongoDB-  Starting in 6.0.3, we balance by data size instead of the number of chunks. So the 128MB is now only the size of data we migrate at-a-time. So large data size per chunk is good now, as long as the data size per shard is even for the collection. refer -  https://www.mongodb.com/community/forums/t/chunk-size-many-times-bigger-than-configure-chunksize-128-mb/212616 https://www.mongodb.com/docs/v6.0/release-notes/6.0/#std-label-release-notes-6.0-balancing-policy-changes




AWS EMR Spark – Much Larger Executors are Created than Requested

  Starting EMR 5.32 and EMR 6.2 you can notice that Spark can launch much larger executors that you request in your job settings. For example - We started a Spark Job with  spark.executor.cores  =   4 But, one can see that the executors with 20 cores (instead of 4 as defined by spark.executor.cores) were launched. The reason for allocating larger executors is that there is a AWS specific Spark option spark.yarn.heterogeneousExecutors.enabled (exists in EMR only, does not exist in Open Source Spark) that is set to true by default that combines multiple executor creation requests on the same node into a larger executor container. So as the result you have fewer executor containers than you expected, each of them has more memory and cores that you specified. If you disable this option (--conf "spark.yarn.heterogeneousExecutors.enabled=false"), EMR will create containers with the specified spark.executor.memory and spark.executor.cores settings and will not co...